• ABOUT US

    JSK 소개

  • Curriculum

    커리큘럼 / 교재

  • Teachers

    선생님 소개

  • contact

    연락처

  • Level Test

    레벨테스트 상담

Have any question?
(63) 32 273 2650
jskeoa@gmail.com
Register Login

Login with your site account

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Register now

English

  • English
  • 한국어
JSK English Academy
  • ABOUT US

    JSK 소개

  • Curriculum

    커리큘럼 / 교재

  • Teachers

    선생님 소개

  • contact

    연락처

  • Level Test

    레벨테스트 상담

samanthacarpenti

Home › Forums › samanthacarpenti

User Avatar
  • Profile
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements
  • Favorites

@samanthacarpenti

Profile

Registered: 2 months ago

How Time Planning Training Is Useless in Poorly-Run Organizations

 
Quit Teaching People to "Prioritize" When Your Organization Has No Idea What Genuinely Is Important: Why Time Organization Training Doesn't Work in Chaotic Workplaces
 
 
Let me going to destroy one of the most widespread false beliefs in corporate training: the belief that training workers better "time organization" methods will resolve time management issues in organizations that have no clear strategic focus themselves.
 
 
With nearly two decades of working with organizations on productivity issues, I can tell you that time management training in a poorly-run company is like instructing someone to arrange their items while their house is actively burning down around them.
 
 
Here's the basic reality: the majority of businesses suffering from time management problems do not have productivity problems - they have leadership failures.
 
 
Traditional task organization training assumes that workplaces have well-defined, stable objectives that employees can be taught to identify and concentrate toward. Such belief is totally disconnected from actual workplace conditions in nearly all contemporary companies.
 
 
We consulted with a major marketing agency where staff were continuously complaining about being "unable to manage their responsibilities effectively." Executives had invested massive sums on task organization training for all workers.
 
 
Their training featured all the standard approaches: urgency-importance grids, ABC classification approaches, calendar organization techniques, and detailed task organization systems.
 
 
Yet productivity continued to get worse, staff overwhelm rates got higher, and work completion results got longer, not more efficient.
 
 
When I analyzed what was really happening, I discovered the real issue: the company itself had absolutely no stable priorities.
 
 
Let me share what the typical situation looked like for workers:
 
 
Regularly: Executive leadership would declare that Client A was the "top objective" and everyone needed to focus on it right away
 
 
24 hours later: A another executive leader would send an "urgent" email insisting that Client B was actually the "top important" priority
 
 
48 hours later: Yet another team leader would call an "urgent" session to announce that Initiative C was a "must-have" requirement that had to be finished by end of week
 
 
Thursday: The original senior executive would voice anger that Project A was not advanced as expected and insist to know why people weren't "prioritizing" it properly
 
 
Friday: All three clients would be delayed, various deliverables would be failed, and workers would be criticized for "poor task planning skills"
 
 
Such scenario was occurring week after week, systematically after month. No amount of "time organization" training was going to assist employees handle this organizational insanity.
 
 
This core challenge wasn't that workers couldn't know how to organize - it was that the agency itself was entirely unable of creating stable direction for more than 72 hours at a time.
 
 
I helped leadership to abandon their emphasis on "employee time planning" training and rather establish what I call "Organizational Priority Management."
 
 
Rather than working to teach staff to organize within a chaotic system, we focused on creating real strategic clarity:
 
 
Established a unified executive leadership committee with clear responsibility for setting and maintaining company priorities
 
 
Created a structured priority evaluation procedure that took place on schedule rather than daily
 
 
Established specific criteria for when priorities could be adjusted and what type of authorization was needed for such adjustments
 
 
Created enforced coordination procedures to make certain that each priority modifications were shared systematically and uniformly across each teams
 
 
Implemented stability times where zero project modifications were permitted without extraordinary justification
 
 
This improvement was instant and substantial:
 
 
Employee overwhelm levels fell dramatically as employees at last understood what they were required to be concentrating on
 
 
Efficiency improved by nearly 50% within six weeks as employees could actually focus on finishing work rather than constantly switching between conflicting requests
 
 
Client delivery times decreased significantly as staff could plan and deliver tasks without constant disruptions and redirection
 
 
Customer relationships got better substantially as work were actually delivered as promised and to standards
 
 
That lesson: instead of you show staff to manage tasks, ensure your leadership genuinely maintains clear direction that are deserving of prioritizing.
 
 
Here's another method that time organization training fails in dysfunctional companies: by believing that employees have real power over their work and tasks.
 
 
I consulted with a municipal agency where workers were repeatedly getting criticized for "ineffective time organization" and sent to "productivity" training sessions.
 
 
The reality was that these workers had essentially zero authority over their daily time. Let me describe what their typical schedule looked like:
 
 
Approximately 60% of their schedule was taken up by required meetings that they were not allowed to avoid, irrespective of whether these sessions were useful to their actual job
 
 
A further 20% of their time was allocated to processing mandatory forms and bureaucratic tasks that contributed absolutely no benefit to their actual job or to the citizens they were intended to help
 
 
This final 20% of their time was supposed to be dedicated for their actual responsibilities - the activities they were paid to do and that actually mattered to the organization
 
 
Additionally even this small amount of time was regularly interrupted by "emergency" demands, unplanned calls, and bureaucratic demands that were not allowed to be postponed
 
 
Given these constraints, zero amount of "time organization" training was able to enable these staff turn more effective. Their issue wasn't their employee priority organization skills - it was an organizational structure that rendered meaningful work virtually impossible.
 
 
The team worked with them implement organizational changes to resolve the underlying obstacles to effectiveness:
 
 
Removed redundant sessions and created strict standards for when meetings were actually required
 
 
Reduced administrative requirements and removed duplicate form-filling processes
 
 
Implemented reserved time for real job activities that couldn't be invaded by non-essential demands
 
 
Developed clear protocols for deciding what represented a legitimate "immediate priority" versus normal tasks that could wait for scheduled slots
 
 
Created workload sharing systems to guarantee that tasks was allocated appropriately and that not any individual was overwhelmed with unrealistic responsibilities
 
 
Employee effectiveness increased significantly, job fulfillment increased notably, and the department finally commenced providing improved outcomes to the citizens they were supposed to support.
 
 
This important point: organizations can't fix productivity problems by teaching individuals to function more efficiently within chaotic organizations. Organizations have to repair the structures before anything else.
 
 
Now let's address possibly the most ridiculous element of priority planning training in chaotic companies: the assumption that staff can somehow prioritize work when the organization at leadership level modifies its focus multiple times per month.
 
 
I consulted with a technology business where the executive leadership was famous for going through "brilliant" ideas numerous times per period and demanding the whole company to instantly pivot to implement each new direction.
 
 
Workers would show up at their jobs on any given day with a specific understanding of their priorities for the week, only to find that the leadership had determined suddenly that all priorities they had been working on was suddenly not important and that they needed to immediately begin focusing on something totally different.
 
 
That pattern would occur numerous times per week. Work that had been stated as "highest priority" would be forgotten before completion, groups would be continuously re-assigned to new initiatives, and massive portions of resources and work would be wasted on work that were not finished.
 
 
Their startup had poured significantly in "adaptive work planning" training and sophisticated task management software to enable employees "adjust rapidly" to evolving directions.
 
 
Yet no level of training or systems could overcome the basic issue: organizations can't successfully manage perpetually evolving priorities. Constant change is the antithesis of successful organization.
 
 
I worked with them create what I call "Disciplined Direction Stability":
 
 
Created scheduled priority review periods where significant direction modifications could be evaluated and approved
 
 
Created strict requirements for what represented a valid reason for modifying agreed-upon objectives apart from the planned review periods
 
 
Created a "direction consistency" time where zero adjustments to current objectives were allowed without exceptional justification
 
 
Established defined coordination systems for when objective modifications were really necessary, featuring full cost assessments of what initiatives would be interrupted
 
 
Required documented approval from several decision-makers before all substantial direction shifts could be approved
 
 
This change was remarkable. After 90 days, actual work success rates improved by more than 300%. Employee stress instances decreased significantly as employees could at last focus on finishing work rather than constantly beginning new ones.
 
 
Product development remarkably increased because departments had enough opportunity to thoroughly develop and test their concepts rather than repeatedly moving to new initiatives before anything could be adequately finished.
 
 
This reality: good planning demands priorities that remain stable long enough for employees to genuinely concentrate on them and achieve meaningful progress.
 
 
This is what I've learned after years in this business: task organization training is exclusively valuable in organizations that genuinely have their strategic priorities functioning.
 
 
If your company has stable strategic objectives, achievable expectations, effective management, and processes that support rather than obstruct efficient work, then task planning training can be helpful.
 
 
But if your organization is characterized by continuous chaos, competing messages, inadequate coordination, excessive demands, and emergency management styles, then time management training is worse than ineffective - it's actively destructive because it blames employee behavior for organizational failures.
 
 
End squandering time on task planning training until you've fixed your organizational dysfunction initially.
 
 
Begin building organizations with stable strategic focus, competent decision-making, and systems that really enable efficient work.
 
 
Company employees can prioritize just well once you offer them something suitable for prioritizing and an organization that actually supports them in doing their work. carrying excessive load with unrealistic demands
 
 
Worker effectiveness improved dramatically, job fulfillment improved notably, and the organization actually began providing improved outcomes to the citizens they were supposed to help.
 
 
This crucial insight: companies can't fix time management problems by training individuals to operate more successfully within dysfunctional structures. Organizations need to fix the structures initially.
 
 
Currently let's examine probably the biggest ridiculous aspect of priority planning training in dysfunctional companies: the assumption that staff can mysteriously manage responsibilities when the company itself changes its focus several times per month.
 
 
The team worked with a IT company where the founder was well-known for going through "innovative" ideas numerous times per period and demanding the entire company to right away shift to implement each new direction.
 
 
Workers would show up at their jobs on any given day with a clear knowledge of their tasks for the day, only to find that the management had determined overnight that all work they had been focusing on was not a priority and that they should to instantly begin focusing on a project totally new.
 
 
That behavior would occur multiple times per month. Work that had been announced as "critical" would be forgotten halfway through, departments would be continuously moved to new work, and massive amounts of resources and investment would be squandered on initiatives that were ultimately not completed.
 
 
The company had invested extensively in "adaptive task management" training and sophisticated task management systems to enable staff "adapt quickly" to changing requirements.
 
 
But no level of education or tools could address the basic problem: organizations can't efficiently prioritize perpetually changing directions. Continuous change is the antithesis of good prioritization.
 
 
The team worked with them establish what I call "Strategic Priority Stability":
 
 
Established scheduled priority planning sessions where significant priority changes could be discussed and adopted
 
 
Established strict criteria for what qualified as a legitimate reason for adjusting agreed-upon objectives beyond the scheduled assessment periods
 
 
Created a "priority protection" phase where zero changes to current objectives were allowed without emergency justification
 
 
Implemented specific notification systems for when objective adjustments were really essential, featuring full impact analyses of what initiatives would be abandoned
 
 
Mandated documented sign-off from several stakeholders before all substantial direction modifications could be approved
 
 
The change was dramatic. After a quarter, measurable project success percentages rose by nearly 300%. Worker stress levels decreased considerably as staff could finally concentrate on delivering work rather than continuously beginning new ones.
 
 
Creativity actually improved because groups had adequate resources to completely develop and test their concepts rather than constantly changing to new initiatives before any work could be fully completed.
 
 
This lesson: effective organization needs objectives that remain stable long enough for people to actually concentrate on them and accomplish substantial results.
 
 
This is what I've learned after years in this field: time management training is only valuable in workplaces that already have their leadership priorities working properly.
 
 
Once your workplace has stable organizational direction, realistic workloads, competent leadership, and structures that facilitate rather than prevent productive activity, then task organization training can be helpful.
 
 
But if your workplace is marked by continuous dysfunction, conflicting messages, incompetent planning, excessive demands, and reactive management cultures, then priority organization training is more harmful than useless - it's directly damaging because it faults individual choices for leadership incompetence.
 
 
Quit wasting money on time management training until you've addressed your organizational direction first.
 
 
Start creating workplaces with clear organizational focus, functional decision-making, and structures that actually enable productive accomplishment.
 
 
Company workers can organize perfectly effectively once you offer them priorities deserving of focusing on and an workplace that genuinely supports them in completing their work.
 
 
If you enjoyed this short article and you would certainly like to obtain even more facts regarding Team Training Brisbane kindly see the site.

Website: https://trainingassessment.bigcartel.com/product/hiring-techniques


Forums

Topics Started: 0

Replies Created: 0

Forum Role: Participant

Search

Categories

  • Blog
  • Business
  • Design / Branding
  • Uncategorized
스피킹 중급 – Open to Debate

스피킹 중급 – Open to Debate

2 회 / 주 (1회 25분)

파닉스 초급 – Oxford Phonics World

2 회 / 주 (1회 25분)

Phonics Monster

40,000 KRW
2 Classes / Week

Teaching English Since 2015 by JSK English Academy. Registered in the Philippines

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Sitemap

Login with your site account

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Register now

Register a new account

Are you a member? Login now