@murraypittman0
Profile
Registered: 2 months, 1 week ago
How Time Planning Training Is Useless in Poorly-Run Organizations
End Teaching People to "Prioritize" When Your Company Has No Idea What Genuinely Is Important: Why Task Planning Training Is Useless in Dysfunctional Companies
Let me ready to dismantle one of the biggest popular false beliefs in corporate training: the belief that showing staff more effective "task management" skills will resolve efficiency challenges in organizations that have no coherent priorities themselves.
After extensive experience of consulting with organizations on efficiency challenges, I can tell you that priority organization training in a chaotic workplace is like instructing someone to arrange their possessions while their home is actively collapsing around them.
Let me share the core problem: the majority of organizations dealing with from time management issues do not have efficiency challenges - they have organizational failures.
Traditional task management training believes that companies have well-defined, unchanging objectives that employees can be trained to identify and concentrate on. Such belief is completely disconnected from reality in the majority of modern workplaces.
We worked with a major advertising agency where workers were repeatedly reporting problems about being "struggling to prioritize their responsibilities properly." Management had invested enormous amounts on priority organization training for all workers.
The training included all the typical approaches: urgency-importance systems, task ranking systems, time organization strategies, and complex task organization applications.
But productivity kept to drop, worker overwhelm rates rose, and work delivery schedules got worse, not more efficient.
After I examined what was actually happening, I learned the real cause: the company at the leadership level had absolutely no stable priorities.
Here's what the typical reality looked like for staff:
Each week: Senior management would communicate that Client A was the "top focus" and each employee needed to focus on it immediately
The next day: A another top manager would announce an "critical" message declaring that Initiative B was actually the "highest essential" focus
Day three: Another different division leader would organize an "emergency" meeting to announce that Initiative C was a "critical" deadline that needed to be completed by end of week
Thursday: The original senior executive would show disappointment that Initiative A hadn't progressed enough and insist to know why people weren't "working on" it properly
By week's end: Each three clients would be incomplete, various commitments would be failed, and workers would be blamed for "poor task organization abilities"
This pattern was repeated week after week, systematically after month. No level of "priority planning" training was going to help workers handle this systemic dysfunction.
Their core problem wasn't that workers did not understand how to organize - it was that the agency as a whole was completely incapable of creating stable strategic focus for more than 24 hours at a time.
The team helped executives to scrap their concentration on "personal task management" training and alternatively create what I call "Strategic Focus Systems."
Instead of trying to train workers to organize within a constantly changing system, we concentrated on establishing genuine strategic clarity:
Implemented a central leadership leadership team with specific power for setting and enforcing organizational direction
Established a formal initiative assessment system that took place regularly rather than constantly
Established clear criteria for when projects could be modified and what level of authorization was necessary for such adjustments
Implemented mandatory notification systems to guarantee that all focus modifications were communicated explicitly and to everyone across each departments
Established protection periods where no priority modifications were acceptable without emergency circumstances
This improvement was remarkable and dramatic:
Employee stress levels decreased dramatically as staff at last knew what they were supposed to be working on
Output rose by more than significantly within 45 days as staff could actually focus on delivering projects rather than constantly redirecting between conflicting demands
Client completion results decreased considerably as staff could coordinate and complete tasks without continuous interruptions and re-prioritization
Customer relationships increased substantially as deliverables were actually completed according to schedule and to specification
This point: instead of you train employees to organize, make sure your organization genuinely possesses clear priorities that are suitable for working toward.
Here's one more way that priority planning training doesn't work in poorly-run organizations: by believing that staff have real authority over their schedule and tasks.
I worked with a government department where employees were continuously receiving blamed for "inadequate time organization" and sent to "productivity" training workshops.
This reality was that these staff had essentially no authority over their work time. This is what their normal workday appeared like:
Approximately the majority of their workday was occupied by compulsory meetings that they were not allowed to decline, regardless of whether these conferences were useful to their real responsibilities
A further 20% of their workday was assigned to completing mandatory reports and administrative requirements that provided no value to their actual responsibilities or to the people they were meant to assist
The leftover small portion of their workday was meant to be dedicated for their core job - the activities they were employed to do and that actually mattered to the public
But even this small amount of schedule was regularly interrupted by "emergency" requests, unexpected calls, and administrative requirements that had no option to be delayed
With these circumstances, absolutely no level of "priority management" training was able to assist these workers become more efficient. Their issue wasn't their personal task organization abilities - it was an systemic framework that rendered efficient work virtually impossible.
I worked with them implement organizational improvements to address the actual obstacles to productivity:
Removed redundant conferences and implemented clear requirements for when gatherings were genuinely justified
Simplified paperwork obligations and eliminated duplicate documentation procedures
Established dedicated blocks for core work tasks that couldn't be invaded by administrative tasks
Created specific protocols for determining what represented a legitimate "emergency" versus standard demands that could be scheduled for scheduled times
Established workload sharing approaches to guarantee that tasks was allocated equitably and that not any single person was overwhelmed with unsustainable responsibilities
Worker productivity rose significantly, job satisfaction got better considerably, and this agency genuinely began delivering improved outcomes to the public they were intended to serve.
This crucial insight: you cannot fix efficiency problems by teaching individuals to work more efficiently within chaotic structures. You must improve the systems initially.
Now let's discuss possibly the greatest laughable component of priority organization training in dysfunctional companies: the idea that employees can magically prioritize work when the management itself modifies its focus several times per week.
I consulted with a IT startup where the founder was well-known for going through "innovative" ideas multiple times per period and demanding the entire organization to instantly shift to implement each new direction.
Workers would come at their jobs on any given day with a clear understanding of their priorities for the day, only to learn that the CEO had concluded suddenly that all priorities they had been focusing on was suddenly not a priority and that they should to right away commence focusing on an initiative entirely unrelated.
That behavior would occur several times per period. Initiatives that had been stated as "critical" would be dropped mid-stream, groups would be continuously moved to alternative initiatives, and significant quantities of resources and investment would be wasted on projects that were ultimately not delivered.
This company had spent significantly in "agile work management" training and advanced project organization software to help staff "adjust quickly" to evolving priorities.
But no degree of education or systems could overcome the basic challenge: people cannot effectively prioritize perpetually shifting priorities. Constant shifting is the enemy of effective prioritization.
The team worked with them create what I call "Focused Direction Consistency":
Created quarterly planning assessment sessions where major priority adjustments could be considered and implemented
Established clear standards for what constituted a legitimate justification for changing established objectives beyond the scheduled planning periods
Created a "direction protection" time where no adjustments to established objectives were acceptable without extraordinary justification
Implemented clear coordination systems for when direction adjustments were absolutely necessary, including full consequence analyses of what projects would be abandoned
Mandated written approval from several decision-makers before all substantial priority modifications could be enacted
The change was outstanding. In three months, actual work success percentages improved by nearly three times. Staff frustration instances dropped considerably as staff could actually work on finishing tasks rather than repeatedly starting new ones.
Innovation remarkably improved because groups had adequate resources to completely develop and refine their solutions rather than continuously changing to new projects before any project could be properly finished.
The reality: successful planning requires directions that keep unchanged long enough for people to genuinely work on them and achieve significant results.
Let me share what I've learned after years in this business: priority planning training is merely effective in organizations that already have their leadership priorities together.
If your workplace has clear strategic priorities, reasonable expectations, functional leadership, and systems that facilitate rather than prevent effective performance, then time organization training can be beneficial.
However if your organization is marked by constant chaos, conflicting messages, incompetent coordination, excessive demands, and emergency decision-making approaches, then task organization training is more harmful than ineffective - it's directly destructive because it blames personal choices for systemic dysfunction.
Stop throwing away money on task organization training until you've fixed your systemic priorities initially.
Focus on establishing workplaces with clear business focus, competent leadership, and processes that actually support meaningful accomplishment.
Company staff can prioritize extremely effectively once you give them direction deserving of prioritizing and an environment that genuinely facilitates them in completing their work. overwhelmed with unrealistic responsibilities
Employee efficiency improved substantially, work fulfillment increased considerably, and their department finally commenced offering better outcomes to the public they were meant to support.
This crucial point: companies cannot solve productivity issues by training individuals to function more efficiently within broken systems. Companies must improve the systems first.
Currently let's discuss probably the most absurd element of time management training in chaotic companies: the assumption that employees can somehow organize tasks when the management itself shifts its direction numerous times per week.
The team worked with a software business where the founder was notorious for going through "game-changing" ideas multiple times per period and expecting the complete company to right away redirect to pursue each new idea.
Workers would show up at their jobs on any given day with a specific awareness of their tasks for the period, only to learn that the management had decided over the weekend that everything they had been focusing on was suddenly not relevant and that they must to instantly begin working on a project entirely new.
That cycle would happen multiple times per week. Projects that had been declared as "highest priority" would be forgotten mid-stream, groups would be constantly redirected to different projects, and massive quantities of time and work would be lost on work that were never delivered.
The company had spent heavily in "adaptive task organization" training and complex priority organization systems to assist employees "respond efficiently" to evolving directions.
However no amount of skill development or software could overcome the fundamental problem: organizations cannot successfully prioritize perpetually changing objectives. Continuous change is the antithesis of good planning.
We helped them implement what I call "Strategic Priority Stability":
Established quarterly strategic assessment cycles where important strategy modifications could be considered and adopted
Created clear standards for what represented a valid reason for changing set priorities apart from the scheduled review sessions
Created a "direction consistency" period where absolutely no modifications to set priorities were permitted without extraordinary approval
Established clear notification systems for when direction adjustments were absolutely required, featuring full consequence assessments of what projects would be interrupted
Established documented approval from multiple leaders before any significant priority changes could be approved
This transformation was outstanding. Within 90 days, actual project success rates improved by nearly 300%. Staff stress rates dropped substantially as staff could actually work on completing work rather than repeatedly initiating new ones.
Product development remarkably got better because groups had enough opportunity to fully implement and refine their ideas rather than continuously moving to new directions before any project could be fully finished.
The reality: successful organization requires directions that remain stable long enough for employees to actually concentrate on them and complete significant outcomes.
Here's what I've learned after years in this industry: task organization training is only useful in companies that already have their strategic priorities functioning.
Once your workplace has consistent business objectives, realistic demands, competent leadership, and systems that support rather than obstruct efficient activity, then time management training can be beneficial.
But if your organization is characterized by continuous dysfunction, unclear messages, inadequate coordination, unrealistic demands, and crisis-driven management cultures, then priority management training is worse than pointless - it's directly harmful because it blames individual behavior for leadership failures.
Quit throwing away money on priority organization training until you've addressed your leadership dysfunction before anything else.
Focus on building organizations with clear strategic priorities, functional management, and systems that really facilitate productive work.
Company employees would prioritize just well once you give them direction suitable for prioritizing and an environment that actually enables them in completing their responsibilities.
In case you loved this short article and you would want to receive much more information concerning Inhouse Training Adelaide generously visit the site.
Website: https://rootcausetraining.bigcartel.com/product/personal-development-training-hobart
Forums
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0
Forum Role: Participant