@melinai2202822
Profile
Registered: 2 months, 2 weeks ago
Customer Service Training: Building Confidence and Communication Skills
Stop Hiring Agreeable People for Customer Service: How Character Trumps Pleasantness Every Time
Let me say something that will most likely upset every hiring person who sees this: selecting people for customer service because of how "agreeable" they appear in an interview is one of the largest errors you can commit.
Agreeable gets you minimal results when a customer is yelling at you about a issue that was not your doing, insisting on outcomes that do not exist, and promising to damage your company on social media.
What succeeds in those moments is resilience, professional standard-maintaining, and the skill to keep concentrated on solutions rather than drama.
I learned this lesson the hard way while working with a significant retail business in Melbourne. Their hiring procedure was completely focused on finding "people-focused" applicants who were "inherently nice" and "enjoyed helping people."
Appears logical, doesn't it?
This consequence: extremely high employee departures, continuous sick leave, and client quality that was consistently subpar.
When I analyzed what was happening, I found that their "pleasant" employees were getting absolutely destroyed by demanding customers.
Such staff had been selected for their natural empathy and need to please others, but they had zero tools or inherent defenses against taking on every client's negative energy.
Even worse, their natural inclination to please people meant they were continuously agreeing to demands they couldn't fulfill, which caused even more frustrated clients and additional pressure for themselves.
The team observed genuinely kind people resign in weeks because they were unable to cope with the mental strain of the work.
Simultaneously, the few staff who performed well in difficult support situations had completely different traits.
They did not seem necessarily "nice" in the conventional sense. Rather, they were resilient, confident, and fine with maintaining boundaries. They truly aimed to assist people, but they also had the strength to communicate "no" when appropriate.
These employees were able to validate a client's upset without accepting it as their fault. They managed to keep professional when clients turned abusive. They managed to concentrate on discovering realistic solutions rather than getting caught up in emotional conflicts.
These characteristics had nothing to do with being "pleasant" and much to do with psychological strength, internal self-assurance, and resilience.
I completely changed their hiring approach. Instead of looking for "pleasant" candidates, we commenced assessing for resilience, analytical ability, and confidence with standard-maintaining.
Throughout interviews, we offered applicants with actual support scenarios: frustrated people, excessive demands, and cases where there was zero complete fix.
Rather than questioning how they would keep the person pleased, we inquired how they would handle the scenario effectively while preserving their own wellbeing and enforcing organizational guidelines.
The candidates who did excellently in these scenarios were seldom the ones who had at first come across as most "agreeable."
Instead, they were the ones who showed logical reasoning under challenging conditions, confidence with stating "no" when required, and the ability to separate their own reactions from the person's psychological state.
Six months after introducing this new hiring approach, staff retention decreased by over significantly. Client experience improved considerably, but even more significantly, ratings specifically among difficult customer interactions got better remarkably.
This is why this strategy works: client relations is fundamentally about problem-solving under stress, not about being continuously appreciated.
Customers who reach customer service are typically already frustrated. They have a problem they are unable to fix themselves, they've frequently beforehand tried multiple approaches, and they require effective help, not superficial agreeableness.
What upset customers genuinely require is someone who:
Recognizes their problem promptly and precisely
Exhibits authentic ability in grasping and addressing their situation
Provides clear explanations about what can and is not possible to be achieved
Takes reasonable action promptly and sees through on promises
Preserves composed composure even when the customer becomes upset
Observe that "agreeableness" doesn't show up anywhere on that list.
Effectiveness, appropriate behavior, and dependability count much more than agreeableness.
In fact, too much pleasantness can often backfire in support interactions. When people are truly upset about a major issue, inappropriately positive or bubbly behavior can seem as inappropriate, fake, or out of touch.
I worked with a investment services company where client relations representatives had been taught to continuously keep "upbeat demeanor" no matter what of the client's situation.
That approach functioned fairly well for routine requests, but it was completely inappropriate for major issues.
When customers called because they'd been denied significant sums of money due to system errors, or because they were confronting financial crisis and needed to arrange assistance options, forced cheerful behavior came across as uncaring and unprofessional.
I taught their representatives to align their communication approach to the seriousness of the customer's situation. Major concerns needed professional, competent responses, not forced cheerfulness.
Service quality improved immediately, notably for complex problems. Clients felt that their problems were being taken appropriately and that the representatives assisting them were skilled professionals rather than merely "pleasant" employees.
This brings me to a different important factor: the difference between understanding and emotional taking on.
Effective client relations staff require understanding - the skill to recognize and acknowledge another people's emotions and viewpoints.
But they certainly do not should have to internalize those feelings as their own.
Emotional taking on is what happens when client relations people start taking on the same upset, anxiety, or hopelessness that their people are going through.
Such emotional taking on is incredibly exhausting and leads to emotional breakdown, reduced job quality, and problematic staff changes.
Healthy compassion, on the other hand, enables staff to recognize and respond to people's interpersonal states without accepting responsibility for solving the person's emotional wellbeing.
Such separation is vital for preserving both job performance and individual wellbeing.
So, what should you screen for when selecting client relations representatives?
First, mental intelligence and toughness. Search for people who can remain calm under stress, who won't accept client frustration as their fault, and who can differentiate their own reactions from other individual's mental states.
Additionally, solution-finding capacity. Customer service is basically about recognizing challenges and discovering practical solutions. Search for individuals who approach problems methodically and who can think effectively even when interacting with frustrated customers.
Furthermore, ease with limit-establishing. Screen for individuals who can communicate "no" politely but firmly when necessary, and who understand the distinction between being helpful and being exploited.
Next, genuine curiosity in solution-finding rather than just "helping people." The most effective support people are driven by the professional stimulation of fixing complicated problems, not just by a wish to be liked.
Finally, professional security and self-respect. Support staff who value themselves and their professional competence are far superior at maintaining professional relationships with customers and providing consistently professional service.
Remember: you're not recruiting individuals to be professional companions or emotional comfort workers. You're hiring competent service providers who can deliver outstanding service while protecting their own mental health and enforcing reasonable standards.
Select for competence, strength, and appropriate behavior. Niceness is less important. Service quality is crucial.
For those who have just about any concerns relating to where by and tips on how to work with Engage Constructively Training, it is possible to call us with our page.
Website: https://emotionalintelligencebrisbane.bigcartel.com/product/training-to-increase-sales
Forums
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0
Forum Role: Participant