@darrellneitenste
Profile
Registered: 1 month, 3 weeks ago
How Time Planning Training Is Useless in Poorly-Run Organizations
Quit Teaching People to "Prioritize" When Your Organization Has Absolutely No Understanding What Really Is Important: How Time Organization Training Doesn't Work in Poorly-Run Organizations
I'll about to dismantle one of the most widespread misconceptions in corporate training: the belief that showing workers improved "time organization" skills will fix efficiency issues in workplaces that have zero clear priorities themselves.
With extensive experience of working with companies on time management problems, I can tell you that task management training in a chaotic workplace is like showing someone to organize their belongings while their house is literally on fire around them.
Let me share the fundamental problem: the majority of companies dealing with from efficiency problems don't have time management problems - they have leadership problems.
Conventional time planning training presupposes that companies have consistent, reliable objectives that staff can learn to recognize and concentrate toward. This belief is totally disconnected from actual workplace conditions in nearly all current companies.
The team worked with a major marketing company where workers were continuously reporting problems about being "unable to manage their tasks properly." Management had poured massive sums on priority planning training for each workers.
This training covered all the standard approaches: urgency-importance systems, task categorization systems, calendar blocking techniques, and detailed task tracking software.
However efficiency continued to decline, staff stress instances rose, and work completion schedules got longer, not better.
After I investigated what was really going on, I found the actual issue: the organization at the leadership level had zero consistent priorities.
Let me share what the typical reality looked like for staff:
Each week: Executive management would declare that Project A was the "highest objective" and everyone must to focus on it right away
The next day: A different senior manager would distribute an "immediate" email declaring that Project B was now the "most critical" objective
48 hours later: Another different team leader would organize an "urgent" session to declare that Project C was a "essential" requirement that had to be delivered by end of week
Day four: The original executive leader would voice disappointment that Project A hadn't progressed sufficiently and insist to know why employees had not been "prioritizing" it as instructed
By week's end: All three clients would be behind, several commitments would be missed, and workers would be held responsible for "ineffective priority planning skills"
This scenario was repeated week after week, systematically after month. Zero degree of "priority management" training was able to help workers manage this management dysfunction.
The basic challenge wasn't that staff couldn't understand how to prioritize - it was that the company as a whole was completely failing of establishing clear strategic focus for more than 48 hours at a time.
The team convinced executives to eliminate their concentration on "individual time organization" training and rather create what I call "Leadership Focus Systems."
Instead of trying to teach workers to organize within a dysfunctional organization, we worked on building actual strategic clarity:
Implemented a central executive leadership team with specific responsibility for setting and preserving organizational focus
Implemented a structured priority assessment system that happened monthly rather than daily
Created written standards for when initiatives could be changed and what degree of authorization was required for such changes
Created mandatory notification systems to make certain that all focus modifications were announced clearly and to everyone across all departments
Created protection times where no focus disruptions were allowed without emergency justification
Their transformation was instant and outstanding:
Worker stress instances dropped dramatically as staff at last knew what they were required to be working on
Productivity improved by more than significantly within 45 days as employees could actually work on delivering tasks rather than constantly redirecting between conflicting priorities
Client quality times got better substantially as staff could organize and execute work without daily interruptions and redirection
Client relationships improved significantly as projects were actually finished on time and to requirements
This lesson: prior to you teach people to manage tasks, make sure your company genuinely maintains clear priorities that are suitable for prioritizing.
This is another approach that priority planning training fails in dysfunctional workplaces: by believing that staff have actual authority over their work and tasks.
We consulted with a municipal agency where staff were continuously being reprimanded for "poor task planning" and required to "productivity" training courses.
Their truth was that these staff had virtually absolutely no control over their daily schedules. Here's what their average day looked like:
Approximately 60% of their time was consumed by compulsory sessions that they were not allowed to decline, regardless of whether these sessions were useful to their actual job
An additional significant portion of their time was dedicated to processing required documentation and paperwork obligations that provided no benefit to their real responsibilities or to the citizens they were intended to serve
The remaining 20% of their time was expected to be used for their real work - the tasks they were hired to do and that actually mattered to the organization
But even this tiny amount of schedule was regularly disrupted by "immediate" requirements, unexpected conferences, and management obligations that were not allowed to be postponed
With these conditions, absolutely no amount of "priority management" training was going to enable these staff become more productive. This problem wasn't their personal time organization abilities - it was an institutional structure that rendered efficient activity essentially impossible.
I helped them create systematic reforms to address the real impediments to effectiveness:
Got rid of pointless conferences and created strict requirements for when meetings were genuinely necessary
Streamlined bureaucratic tasks and eliminated redundant reporting procedures
Implemented reserved blocks for actual work tasks that would not be disrupted by non-essential demands
Established defined protocols for evaluating what qualified as a real "emergency" versus standard tasks that could be planned for designated times
Created task distribution systems to guarantee that tasks was shared appropriately and that zero individual was overburdened with unsustainable demands
Worker efficiency improved substantially, work happiness increased substantially, and this organization finally started delivering improved outcomes to the public they were supposed to help.
That key lesson: you can't fix time management problems by showing individuals to function more effectively productively within chaotic systems. Companies need to fix the structures first.
Currently let's examine probably the most laughable component of task management training in chaotic organizations: the belief that workers can somehow manage work when the management at leadership level modifies its priorities several times per day.
We worked with a IT startup where the founder was well-known for experiencing "game-changing" ideas several times per week and requiring the whole organization to right away redirect to accommodate each new priority.
Workers would show up at work on any given day with a clear understanding of their tasks for the day, only to find that the management had decided suddenly that all work they had been focusing on was suddenly not relevant and that they should to right away begin focusing on a project completely unrelated.
That behavior would happen several times per week. Work that had been stated as "essential" would be forgotten before completion, groups would be continuously moved to new work, and massive quantities of time and work would be lost on work that were never finished.
The startup had poured extensively in "agile work organization" training and sophisticated priority management software to enable workers "adjust quickly" to shifting requirements.
However no degree of education or systems could overcome the basic problem: people cannot successfully organize perpetually evolving objectives. Constant shifting is the opposite of effective organization.
We worked with them create what I call "Disciplined Priority Consistency":
Created regular strategic review cycles where important strategy modifications could be considered and adopted
Developed firm criteria for what constituted a genuine justification for adjusting agreed-upon priorities apart from the planned planning cycles
Implemented a "direction stability" time where absolutely no adjustments to current directions were allowed without emergency approval
Established clear coordination systems for when direction changes were really necessary, featuring thorough cost assessments of what initiatives would be interrupted
Mandated documented approval from senior stakeholders before any significant direction changes could be enacted
The transformation was dramatic. After three months, actual initiative delivery statistics rose by more than dramatically. Employee frustration levels dropped considerably as people could actually work on finishing tasks rather than continuously starting new ones.
Creativity remarkably increased because groups had sufficient opportunity to fully develop and refine their solutions rather than constantly moving to new initiatives before any project could be properly completed.
That reality: effective planning needs priorities that stay stable long enough for teams to genuinely focus on them and achieve substantial outcomes.
Here's what I've learned after extensive time in this industry: priority management training is merely valuable in companies that already have their strategic systems together.
If your organization has clear business priorities, achievable workloads, competent leadership, and systems that support rather than obstruct efficient activity, then task management training can be useful.
But if your workplace is defined by constant chaos, unclear directions, inadequate coordination, impossible demands, and emergency leadership cultures, then time organization training is more counterproductive than ineffective - it's directly destructive because it holds responsible employee behavior for systemic incompetence.
Stop wasting money on time management training until you've fixed your systemic priorities first.
Focus on establishing companies with clear business focus, competent leadership, and systems that actually support meaningful activity.
The workers will manage tasks just effectively once you offer them priorities worth working toward and an organization that really supports them in doing their work. overwhelmed with unsustainable demands
Employee productivity rose dramatically, job fulfillment increased considerably, and this department genuinely began delivering better outcomes to the citizens they were supposed to support.
That key insight: organizations cannot address productivity challenges by teaching employees to work better efficiently within broken organizations. You have to fix the organizations before anything else.
Now let's address probably the biggest absurd element of time management training in chaotic companies: the idea that staff can magically organize responsibilities when the organization itself modifies its focus several times per week.
We worked with a software business where the executive leadership was notorious for going through "innovative" revelations multiple times per day and demanding the entire team to immediately shift to pursue each new direction.
Employees would arrive at the office on Monday with a specific awareness of their objectives for the week, only to find that the leadership had decided over the weekend that all work they had been focusing on was no longer a priority and that they needed to immediately commence focusing on a project totally different.
That behavior would occur numerous times per period. Initiatives that had been announced as "essential" would be dropped mid-stream, teams would be repeatedly moved to new work, and enormous amounts of effort and investment would be squandered on work that were not delivered.
The organization had spent significantly in "agile work planning" training and sophisticated task tracking software to assist staff "respond quickly" to changing requirements.
However absolutely no degree of education or software could address the basic issue: people won't be able to efficiently organize continuously shifting objectives. Perpetual change is the opposite of successful planning.
We worked with them implement what I call "Strategic Priority Management":
Created scheduled strategic review periods where important direction modifications could be considered and implemented
Established strict criteria for what represented a legitimate basis for adjusting established directions outside the planned review cycles
Created a "direction protection" time where absolutely no modifications to set directions were permitted without emergency justification
Created clear coordination procedures for when objective modifications were absolutely required, including full impact evaluations of what projects would be delayed
Established formal sign-off from senior leaders before any significant strategy shifts could be implemented
Their change was remarkable. After three months, real initiative delivery percentages increased by over three times. Staff frustration rates fell substantially as employees could finally focus on finishing projects rather than repeatedly initiating new ones.
Creativity actually improved because departments had adequate resources to thoroughly explore and refine their solutions rather than repeatedly moving to new initiatives before anything could be fully completed.
This lesson: good planning requires objectives that keep unchanged long enough for teams to actually concentrate on them and complete meaningful results.
This is what I've concluded after extensive time in this business: time planning training is exclusively valuable in workplaces that genuinely have their organizational act working properly.
When your workplace has clear organizational objectives, reasonable workloads, effective leadership, and processes that support rather than hinder effective performance, then task management training can be helpful.
However if your company is defined by constant chaos, conflicting directions, inadequate planning, excessive demands, and crisis-driven management cultures, then priority planning training is more harmful than ineffective - it's actively destructive because it blames personal performance for leadership dysfunction.
End wasting time on time organization training until you've addressed your organizational direction before anything else.
Start establishing organizations with stable business priorities, functional management, and structures that really facilitate productive accomplishment.
The staff would organize just fine once you offer them something deserving of focusing on and an organization that actually supports them in accomplishing their responsibilities.
For more information about Internal Culture Training have a look at our webpage.
Website: https://topleadersworkplace.bigcartel.com/product/complaints-within-workplace
Forums
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0
Forum Role: Participant