• ABOUT US

    JSK 소개

  • Curriculum

    커리큘럼 / 교재

  • Teachers

    선생님 소개

  • contact

    연락처

  • Level Test

    레벨테스트 상담

Have any question?
(63) 32 273 2650
jskeoa@gmail.com
Register Login

Login with your site account

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Register now

English

  • English
  • 한국어
JSK English Academy
  • ABOUT US

    JSK 소개

  • Curriculum

    커리큘럼 / 교재

  • Teachers

    선생님 소개

  • contact

    연락처

  • Level Test

    레벨테스트 상담

cortezgreenleaf

Home › Forums › cortezgreenleaf

User Avatar
  • Profile
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements
  • Favorites

@cortezgreenleaf

Profile

Registered: 4 months ago

How Time Planning Training Is Useless in Poorly-Run Organizations

 
End Teaching People to "Organize" When Your Business Has Zero Understanding What Actually Should Be Priority: The Reason Task Organization Training Is Useless in Chaotic Companies
 
 
I'm going to demolish one of the most widespread myths in corporate training: the belief that showing employees more effective "prioritization" skills will solve productivity issues in organizations that have absolutely no clear strategic focus themselves.
 
 
With seventeen years of training with businesses on productivity problems, I can tell you that task organization training in a chaotic company is like showing someone to arrange their items while their house is currently burning down around them.
 
 
Let me share the basic issue: nearly all companies dealing with from efficiency crises don't have efficiency problems - they have leadership problems.
 
 
Standard time planning training assumes that companies have consistent, stable objectives that workers can learn to recognize and focus with. This idea is totally divorced from reality in the majority of current organizations.
 
 
The team consulted with a significant communications agency where employees were continuously complaining about being "struggling to manage their work effectively." Leadership had spent enormous amounts on priority management training for every workers.
 
 
This training included all the usual approaches: urgency-importance matrices, priority categorization methods, time management methods, and detailed project organization applications.
 
 
However efficiency remained to get worse, employee stress rates rose, and work delivery times got more unreliable, not more efficient.
 
 
Once I investigated what was genuinely going on, I found the actual problem: the organization at the leadership level had no clear direction.
 
 
Let me share what the daily reality looked like for staff:
 
 
Each week: Executive executives would communicate that Initiative A was the "highest objective" and everyone should to focus on it immediately
 
 
24 hours later: A different top leader would distribute an "urgent" message declaring that Project B was really the "most important" priority
 
 
Wednesday: Yet another division manager would schedule an "urgent" conference to declare that Project C was a "essential" deadline that needed to be finished by Friday
 
 
The following day: The first executive executive would show disappointment that Initiative A had not advanced enough and require to know why staff weren't "prioritizing" it properly
 
 
End of week: Every three projects would be incomplete, various commitments would be failed, and employees would be blamed for "poor time management techniques"
 
 
This pattern was occurring week after week, month after month. Zero degree of "task planning" training was able to enable staff handle this systemic chaos.
 
 
The core challenge wasn't that workers didn't understand how to prioritize - it was that the organization itself was entirely incapable of creating stable strategic focus for more than 72 hours at a time.
 
 
We convinced management to abandon their concentration on "individual task management" training and alternatively create what I call "Organizational Focus Management."
 
 
Instead of trying to train employees to manage within a dysfunctional environment, we worked on building genuine strategic clarity:
 
 
Implemented a single executive management group with specific power for determining and enforcing organizational focus
 
 
Created a structured priority review system that took place regularly rather than daily
 
 
Established specific criteria for when projects could be changed and what type of approval was necessary for such adjustments
 
 
Established required notification protocols to ensure that each focus adjustments were shared clearly and to everyone across every teams
 
 
Established buffer times where zero priority changes were permitted without exceptional circumstances
 
 
The change was immediate and dramatic:
 
 
Employee overwhelm levels decreased dramatically as employees finally understood what they were required to be focusing on
 
 
Productivity rose by more than 50% within a month and a half as employees could actually concentrate on finishing tasks rather than continuously switching between competing priorities
 
 
Project completion schedules decreased considerably as staff could coordinate and deliver tasks without continuous disruptions and re-prioritization
 
 
Client relationships got better dramatically as projects were consistently delivered as promised and to requirements
 
 
The lesson: prior to you teach employees to prioritize, ensure your organization genuinely maintains clear direction that are suitable for prioritizing.
 
 
Let me share a different approach that task planning training proves useless in poorly-run workplaces: by presupposing that staff have genuine authority over their time and tasks.
 
 
We consulted with a government department where workers were continuously being blamed for "ineffective task management" and mandated to "efficiency" training workshops.
 
 
Their reality was that these staff had virtually absolutely no influence over their job activities. This is what their typical day looked like:
 
 
Roughly the majority of their time was occupied by mandatory sessions that they were not allowed to decline, irrespective of whether these sessions were necessary to their actual responsibilities
 
 
Another 20% of their schedule was dedicated to completing bureaucratic forms and administrative tasks that provided zero usefulness to their primary job or to the clients they were supposed to assist
 
 
This final one-fifth of their workday was supposed to be dedicated for their core work - the activities they were hired to do and that really was important to the agency
 
 
However even this tiny portion of schedule was continuously interrupted by "immediate" requirements, unexpected conferences, and management obligations that couldn't be delayed
 
 
With these circumstances, zero level of "task planning" training was going to help these staff turn more effective. The challenge wasn't their individual task organization abilities - it was an systemic system that ensured productive accomplishment almost unachievable.
 
 
The team worked with them establish systematic changes to address the actual barriers to productivity:
 
 
Got rid of redundant meetings and established specific standards for when gatherings were really justified
 
 
Streamlined bureaucratic obligations and removed unnecessary documentation requirements
 
 
Implemented dedicated blocks for core work tasks that would not be disrupted by meetings
 
 
Established clear systems for determining what represented a legitimate "urgent situation" versus normal demands that could be scheduled for appropriate times
 
 
Established delegation approaches to ensure that tasks was shared equitably and that no single person was overburdened with unsustainable demands
 
 
Worker productivity rose significantly, work happiness increased considerably, and their organization actually started offering improved results to the public they were intended to serve.
 
 
That key insight: organizations cannot address productivity issues by training people to work better efficiently within chaotic systems. Companies have to improve the organizations first.
 
 
Now let's examine possibly the greatest ridiculous element of time organization training in chaotic organizations: the belief that employees can mysteriously manage tasks when the management at leadership level changes its priorities multiple times per day.
 
 
The team worked with a technology startup where the founder was famous for going through "brilliant" revelations several times per day and expecting the whole organization to immediately shift to accommodate each new priority.
 
 
Staff would come at work on Monday with a defined awareness of their objectives for the week, only to discover that the leadership had concluded over the weekend that everything they had been focusing on was not relevant and that they should to right away commence working on an initiative totally new.
 
 
This pattern would happen numerous times per period. Work that had been stated as "highest priority" would be dropped mid-stream, teams would be continuously redirected to new work, and massive portions of effort and work would be lost on initiatives that were never completed.
 
 
The company had invested extensively in "flexible project planning" training and advanced project organization tools to assist staff "adapt quickly" to shifting directions.
 
 
But no level of education or software could address the fundamental challenge: you won't be able to efficiently prioritize perpetually evolving objectives. Perpetual shifting is the enemy of good prioritization.
 
 
The team assisted them create what I call "Focused Objective Management":
 
 
Implemented scheduled planning planning cycles where significant priority changes could be evaluated and approved
 
 
Established firm criteria for what constituted a genuine basis for adjusting established objectives beyond the planned review cycles
 
 
Created a "objective consistency" period where zero modifications to established directions were allowed without exceptional justification
 
 
Created specific communication protocols for when priority modifications were absolutely necessary, featuring complete impact evaluations of what work would be delayed
 
 
Required formal sign-off from multiple stakeholders before all major direction modifications could be implemented
 
 
The transformation was dramatic. After three months, measurable work success statistics rose by over dramatically. Employee stress levels decreased considerably as staff could at last work on finishing work rather than repeatedly starting new ones.
 
 
Product development surprisingly improved because teams had adequate opportunity to fully implement and refine their ideas rather than repeatedly moving to new initiatives before any project could be properly finished.
 
 
That reality: effective prioritization needs objectives that keep consistent long enough for people to actually concentrate on them and accomplish meaningful results.
 
 
Let me share what I've concluded after years in this field: time management training is merely valuable in companies that currently have their strategic priorities together.
 
 
When your workplace has clear business objectives, reasonable expectations, effective leadership, and processes that enable rather than obstruct productive activity, then priority organization training can be helpful.
 
 
However if your organization is characterized by continuous dysfunction, conflicting messages, poor organization, impossible workloads, and emergency leadership cultures, then priority management training is worse than pointless - it's directly harmful because it faults individual performance for systemic dysfunction.
 
 
Quit squandering resources on time planning training until you've addressed your systemic priorities initially.
 
 
Begin creating workplaces with consistent organizational direction, functional leadership, and systems that genuinely facilitate efficient activity.
 
 
Your employees can organize extremely fine once you provide them priorities deserving of prioritizing and an workplace that genuinely supports them in accomplishing their work. overwhelmed with unrealistic demands
 
 
Worker effectiveness rose significantly, job satisfaction increased considerably, and their agency genuinely started providing better results to the citizens they were intended to support.
 
 
That key insight: you won't be able to address efficiency issues by teaching employees to function better productively within broken organizations. Companies have to fix the structures first.
 
 
Currently let's discuss probably the most laughable aspect of priority planning training in chaotic companies: the belief that staff can magically organize responsibilities when the management at leadership level modifies its direction numerous times per day.
 
 
We consulted with a software startup where the founder was well-known for having "brilliant" revelations several times per day and requiring the entire company to immediately redirect to pursue each new direction.
 
 
Workers would come at the office on any given day with a clear understanding of their objectives for the period, only to find that the CEO had concluded suddenly that all work they had been focusing on was suddenly not a priority and that they needed to instantly begin working on an initiative totally different.
 
 
That cycle would occur multiple times per month. Initiatives that had been declared as "critical" would be abandoned mid-stream, groups would be continuously re-assigned to new work, and massive quantities of effort and energy would be wasted on work that were not completed.
 
 
This organization had poured extensively in "adaptive task planning" training and advanced task organization software to assist employees "respond quickly" to shifting directions.
 
 
But no level of skill development or systems could solve the basic issue: people won't be able to successfully manage perpetually shifting directions. Constant shifting is the enemy of successful prioritization.
 
 
The team worked with them create what I call "Strategic Priority Management":
 
 
Established quarterly planning planning periods where important strategy modifications could be evaluated and approved
 
 
Established clear criteria for what represented a legitimate basis for adjusting established directions apart from the scheduled planning cycles
 
 
Established a "direction consistency" phase where zero changes to set priorities were allowed without emergency justification
 
 
Implemented specific notification procedures for when direction changes were really required, including complete cost analyses of what initiatives would be delayed
 
 
Required written approval from multiple leaders before all major direction changes could be approved
 
 
The improvement was dramatic. Within three months, actual work success statistics increased by more than three times. Worker burnout rates decreased considerably as staff could actually work on delivering projects rather than continuously beginning new ones.
 
 
Innovation remarkably increased because departments had enough resources to fully develop and evaluate their concepts rather than continuously changing to new initiatives before any project could be fully finished.
 
 
The reality: successful planning demands directions that keep stable long enough for people to actually focus on them and accomplish significant results.
 
 
Let me share what I've concluded after years in this industry: priority planning training is merely useful in organizations that currently have their organizational systems functioning.
 
 
Once your company has stable strategic direction, reasonable demands, functional management, and processes that enable rather than prevent efficient activity, then time planning training can be beneficial.
 
 
But if your workplace is marked by continuous dysfunction, competing priorities, incompetent organization, unrealistic expectations, and emergency management cultures, then priority planning training is more harmful than useless - it's systematically harmful because it blames personal choices for systemic failures.
 
 
End squandering resources on priority planning training until you've addressed your leadership direction first.
 
 
Focus on establishing workplaces with stable organizational direction, competent management, and structures that genuinely support productive activity.
 
 
Company workers will prioritize just effectively once you provide them something worth prioritizing and an organization that really enables them in doing their responsibilities.
 
 
To find out more in regards to Delegation Training Perth review the web page.

Website: https://businessskills.bigcartel.com/product/participants-training-perth


Forums

Topics Started: 0

Replies Created: 0

Forum Role: Participant

Search

Categories

  • Blog
  • Business
  • Design / Branding
  • Uncategorized
스피킹 중급 – Open to Debate

스피킹 중급 – Open to Debate

2 회 / 주 (1회 25분)

파닉스 초급 – Oxford Phonics World

2 회 / 주 (1회 25분)

Phonics Monster

40,000 KRW
2 Classes / Week

Teaching English Since 2015 by JSK English Academy. Registered in the Philippines

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Sitemap

Login with your site account

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Register now

Register a new account

Are you a member? Login now